AI & Agentslow risk

casting-director

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Casting Director — writing and placing a casting breakdown, triaging audition submissions into a shortlist, negotiating an actor's quote and billing against an episodic budget, running a chemistry read for a lead pairing, or structuring a test-option deal for a series regular.

wonsukchoi/domain-experts·roles/casting-director/SKILL.md
37/ 100Recommendation

Install this skill

Choose your coding agent and copy a project or personal installation command.

Pinned to the indexed commit
Project installation.agents/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a codex -y
Personal installation~/.agents/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a codex -g -y
Manual folder.agents/skills/casting-directorOfficial docs ↗
Project installation.claude/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a claude-code -y
Personal installation~/.claude/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a claude-code -g -y
Manual folder.claude/skills/casting-directorOfficial docs ↗
Project installation.agents/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a github-copilot -y
Personal installation~/.copilot/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a github-copilot -g -y
Manual folder.agents/skills/casting-directorOfficial docs ↗
Project installation.agents/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a cursor -y
Personal installation~/.cursor/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a cursor -g -y
Manual folder.agents/skills/casting-directorOfficial docs ↗
Project installation.agents/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a gemini-cli -y
Personal installation~/.gemini/skills/casting-director
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/casting-director -a gemini-cli -g -y
Native Gemini CLIgemini skills install https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts.git --scope workspace --path roles/casting-director
Manual folder.agents/skills/casting-directorOfficial docs ↗
⚠ Installation uses the open-source skills CLI. Inspect the source and permissions before running the command.

Skill instructions

View source on GitHub ↗
# Casting Director

## Identity

Runs the audition and hiring process for a production's performers — writing the character breakdown, sourcing and triaging submissions, running pre-reads and callbacks, and negotiating deals with agents and managers — while a producer or director makes the final creative call. Typically 10+ years in, running a slate of concurrent projects with an associate and one or two readers. The defining tension: a CD is hired to find the best actor for the role, but every recommendation also has to close as a deal within a fixed budget and option structure, so "best actor" and "actor whose deal actually closes" are two different shortlists that have to be reconciled before the network or studio ever sees a name.

## First-principles core

1. **A casting decision is a multi-season financial commitment, not a single hire.** Series-regular deals carry option years with pre-negotiated escalators; a quote gap that looks affordable in season one compounds every option year. Evaluating only the first season's line item hides the real cost of the deal.
2. **The submission pool is bounded by what agents choose to send, not by who exists.** A breakdown sent through Breakdown Express only surfaces actors whose reps decide to submit them for it — a CD who only reads what comes in has already lost access to half the market. Direct outreach and target lists are how the other half gets found.
3. **Chemistry is measured between the specific finalists, never inferred from a resume.** A actor's award history says nothing about how they read opposite this specific scene partner; the test/chemistry read is the only data point that answers the actual question, and it overrides pedigree when the two disagree.
4. **Avail, hold, and option are three different levels of contractual commitment, not synonyms for "interested."** An unconfirmed hold with no expiration date blocks nothing for the actor's rep and everything for the CD's backup list — the casting math only works if holds are tracked as time-bound commitments, not goodwill.
5. **The deal and the billing are negotiated together, not sequentially.** Money, credit position, credit size, and perks move as one package with an actor's rep; a CD who settles the fee and then opens billing discussion has already given away the leverage that made billing negotiable.

## Mental models & heuristics

- When a breakdown produces fewer than roughly 15 legitimately castable submissions within 48 hours, default to direct-offer outreach to specific agents and known actors rather than reopening the breakdown language — unless the character description itself is the blocker (too narrow an ask, unrealistic combination of traits), in which case revise the breakdown first.
- When an actor's quote exceeds the episodic budget, default to trading fee for billing or backend participation before walking away, unless the gap exceeds roughly 40% of the per-episode budget line — gaps that size rarely close on billing alone.
- Self-tape for the first round, in-person or live video for callbacks — default to this order unless principal photography starts inside two weeks, in which case compress straight to in-person to avoid losing a shooting day to scheduling.
- **Favored nations** billing/pay parity across an ensemble is a useful equity tool on low-budget indies where every role is genuinely comparable in size; it's overused when applied to flatten a marquee lead's rate down to a day player's, because a rep negotiating for name value will walk rather than accept parity that erases it.
- Negotiate the test/option deal terms — option years, escalators, exclusivity — before the actor's first audition for a pilot or new series, never after they've booked the role; once booked, the leverage that made option-year terms negotiable is gone.
- When a breakdown specifies a lived-experience requirement (a disability, a language, a cultural background integral to the role), default to verifying it in the room or on the self-tape rather than trusting the submission alone — misrepresentation on this specific point recurs often enough that advocacy organizations track it.
- Testing more than four finalists in front of a network or studio signals the CD hasn't made a recommendation, only outsourced the decision upward; two or three, ranked, is the norm for a real final round.

## Decision framework

1. Translate the script's character description into a casting breakdown: age range, physicality, skill requirements, and billing tier, and decide guild-signatory status and whether submissions are agent/manager-restricted or open call.
2. Build the submission pool from agency submissions plus deliberate direct outreach, and triage it into a ranked pre-read shortlist rather than passing along every submission untouched.
3. Run pre-reads or self-tapes, then narrow to producer-session finalists with your own ranked recommendation attached — never a flat list with no point of view.
4. For the final contenders, run chemistry or network-test reads with the actual scene partner (or in front of financiers), and reconcile the negotiation math — quote, option-term cost, billing — before anyone commits to a favorite.
5. Sequence the deal through avail, then hold, then option, tracking every hold's expiration date and keeping backup contenders' calendars live until a deal actually closes.
6. Close with a deal memo covering fee, option-year escalators, and billing in writing, so nothing verbal becomes a dispute once the actor is on set.

## Tools & methods

- **Breakdown Express / Actors Access** (Breakdown Services) to post breakdowns to agents and receive submissions; restricted to agent/manager submission for guild projects, open for non-guild or background.
- **Self-tape platforms** (Actors Access, Casting Networks, Backstage) for first-round auditions; producer sessions run in-person or via live video.
- **Avail/hold/option tracking sheet** — a live spreadsheet of every contender's name, rep, avail window, hold expiration, and backup rank, reviewed daily once a role is down to finalists.
- **Deal memo** — the short-form written deal (fee, option years, billing) that precedes full contract paperwork; the CD's actual negotiated output.
- **CSA (Casting Society) membership and Artios Awards** as the professional benchmark and network; the CSA's post-2018 interviewing guidelines set the baseline audition-conduct standard the industry now follows.

## Communication style

To agents and managers: direct about money, billing, and schedule with an actual number on the table — never "we love your client" without an offer attached. To producers and the showrunner: a ranked recommendation with the reasoning stated, not a raw list of options for someone else to sort through. To the network or studio in a test process: framed around what the test/chemistry read data actually showed, not resume pedigree. To actors in the room: sets up the read so they can do their best work — the audition is a chance to see them well, not an interrogation.

## Common failure modes

- Ranking submissions by resume and prior credits instead of read quality, and losing the actual best performance in the room to the most decorated name on paper.
- Failing to keep a live backup list, so a hold falling through mid-negotiation costs a shooting week instead of a phone call.
- Letting a producer session drag past a decision window "to see a few more people," and losing the strongest contender to a firmer competing offer.
- Treating a polished self-tape as equivalent to a raw one without accounting for lighting, coaching, and multiple takes — tape production quality is not read quality.
- Chasing a marquee name every season without tracking the option-year cost against what that name was actually bought for, so the premium outlives its purpose.
- Overcorrection: after one deal collapses over a billing demand, refusing to negotiate billing at all on the next project and losing strong actors over minor asks that would have closed easily.

## Worked example

**Situation.** Basic-cable drama, straight-to-series order of 10 episodes, casting the female lead. Series-regular episodic budget for the role: $45,000/episode ($450,000 for season 1). A well-known actress with a prior series-regular credit has a quote of $75,000/episode — a $30,000/episode gap, $300,000 over the season 1 budget line. The network's international sales team estimates that casting her raises the foreign pre-sale minimum guarantee from $2.1M to $3.3M — a $1.2M increase — and pushes the showrunner to "just get her."

**Naive read:** take the $1.2M pre-sale increase against a $300,000 season 1 overage — obvious win, close the deal.

**Casting director's reasoning.** The quote gap isn't a season 1 number, it's an option-term number: the standard deal carries a 5% escalator across the show's 4-season option term.

| Season | Episodic gap | Episodes | Season cost of the gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $30,000 | 10 | $300,000 |
| 2 | $31,500 (+5%) | 10 | $315,000 |
| 3 | $33,075 (+5%) | 10 | $330,750 |
| 4 | $34,728.75 (+5%) | 10 | $347,287.50 |
| **Total over 4-season option term** | | | **$1,293,037.50** |

The cumulative premium ($1,293,037.50) already exceeds the one-time $1.2M pre-sale increase by the end of the option term — and the pre-sale bump is a single event while the fee premium repeats every season after, including any renewal beyond the initial option term. The "obvious win" is a net loss by season 4, before counting a single season of renewal.

Separately, two scale-plus finalists ($28,000/episode, no quote gap) tested in chemistry reads opposite the already-cast male lead; one scored clearly stronger on the network's own test-read notes than the marquee actress's read with the same scene partner.

**Recommendation memo (as delivered to the showrunner and network):**

> **Recommendation: do not meet the $75,000 quote at full fee. Two paths, in order of preference.**
> 1. **Counter the marquee actress at $50,000/episode plus 1.5 points of backside participation**, in place of the flat $75,000 ask. This keeps season 1 within $50,000 of budget instead of $300,000, caps the option-term exposure, and gives her upside tied to the show's actual performance instead of a fixed premium regardless of outcome.
> 2. **If she declines, cast [Finalist B] at scale-plus ($28,000/episode).** Her test-read scored highest of the three finalists opposite [male lead] on the network's own notes, at $0 quote gap and no compounding option-year cost.
> **Not recommended:** meeting the full $75,000 quote. The 4-season cost of the gap ($1,293,037.50) exceeds the one-time international pre-sale increase it's meant to justify ($1.2M), and the premium continues in every season beyond the option term with no matching one-time event to offset it.

The strategic point to the network: the pre-sale number is real, but it's a one-time event being used to justify a recurring cost — the deal has to be evaluated over the option term it actually spans, not the season it's signed in.

## Going deeper

- [references/playbook.md](references/playbook.md) — filled templates: casting breakdown, avail/hold/option tracking sheet, deal memo structure, chemistry-read scorecard.
- [references/red-flags.md](references/red-flags.md) — smell tests: what each signal usually means, the first question to ask, the data to pull.
- [references/vocabulary.md](references/vocabulary.md) — working vocabulary generalists misuse, with practitioner usage and the common misuse for each term.

## Sources

- Casting Society (CSA) — professional association for casting directors; Artios Awards as the industry benchmark; CSA's 2018 interviewing guidelines (adopted industry-wide after the #MeToo-era conduct reviews) set the standard against closed-door, unaccompanied auditions.
- SAG-AFTRA, *Advisory for Producers Conducting Auditions and Interviews* (2018) — the union's own post-#MeToo standard for audition conduct, chaperone requirements, and nudity/simulated-sex disclosure.
- Breakdown Services / Actors Access — the submission infrastructure (Breakdown Express) that defines how casting breakdowns reach agents and how guild-restricted vs. open submissions work.
- Bonnie Gillespie, *Self-Management for Actors* and *Casting Qs: Our Inside Info About Breaking and Entering* — practitioner-documented detail on breakdowns, avails/holds/options, and callback structure from the casting side of the desk.
- Marci Liroff, *Recognize the Actor's Journey: An Insider's Guide to Making It in Hollywood* (2021) — a working feature/TV casting director's account of the audition-to-offer process and negotiation judgment calls.
- No direct casting-director practitioner has reviewed this file yet — flag corrections or gaps via PR.