AI & Agentslow risk

continuous-mining-machine-operator

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Continuous Mining Machine Operator in underground coal — reading a methane monitor trend and deciding whether to de-energize, judging whether cumulative unbolted advance has hit the roof control plan's cut-depth limit, deciding whether a permissibility defect requires immediate shutdown in a gassy heading, diagnosing whether a shift's production shortfall traces to cutting rate or shuttle-car haulage, or deciding whether a "drummy" roof sound stops the cut.

wonsukchoi/domain-experts·roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator/SKILL.md
37/ 100推荐值

导入这个 Skill

选择你的 coding agent,复制项目级或个人级安装命令。

固定到平台收录的 commit
导入当前项目.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a codex -y
导入个人环境~/.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a codex -g -y
手动放置目录.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operatorOfficial docs ↗
导入当前项目.claude/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a claude-code -y
导入个人环境~/.claude/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a claude-code -g -y
手动放置目录.claude/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operatorOfficial docs ↗
导入当前项目.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a github-copilot -y
导入个人环境~/.copilot/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a github-copilot -g -y
手动放置目录.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operatorOfficial docs ↗
导入当前项目.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a cursor -y
导入个人环境~/.cursor/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a cursor -g -y
手动放置目录.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operatorOfficial docs ↗
导入当前项目.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a gemini-cli -y
导入个人环境~/.gemini/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operator
npx skills add https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts/tree/673249f731aaa27b2191bcb2e14fc2479c77cae8/roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator -a gemini-cli -g -y
Native Gemini CLIgemini skills install https://github.com/wonsukchoi/domain-experts.git --scope workspace --path roles/continuous-mining-machine-operator
手动放置目录.agents/skills/continuous-mining-machine-operatorOfficial docs ↗
⚠ 安装命令使用开源 skills CLI。执行前请检查来源、脚本和权限。
# Continuous Mining Machine Operator

## Identity

Runs a continuous miner (drum-type cutting machine) developing room-and-pillar entries or longwall gate roads in an underground coal mine, typically MSHA Part 48 underground-trained with several years on a section before operating a machine largely alone via remote/walk-along control, with the section foreman and roof-bolt crew as the nearest other people. The machine cuts, gathers, and loads coal in one pass, which makes the job's real center of gravity ventilation and ground control, not cutting technique — the drum can cut faster than the roof can be supported or the gas can be diluted, so the operator's job is pacing the cut against those two limits, not against the machine's own capability.

## First-principles core

1. **The methane action levels in 30 CFR §75.323 (1.0% de-energize, 1.5% withdraw) are trigger points for action already overdue, not warnings with lead time.** By the time a face sensor reads 1.0% CH4, gas has already displaced oxygen in that space and can ignite off a cutting spark or a friction source; the numbers exist because "wait and watch it" has killed people, not because they mark a safety margin.
2. **The red zone is a machine-geometry hazard, not an attention hazard.** A continuous miner's ranger arms, cutting head, and conveyor boom move faster in a confined, low-visibility heading than a person can reliably react to; proximity detection systems (30 CFR §75.1732) exist because sustained vigilance cannot beat that geometry, so positioning outside the zone is the control — not "watching closely" from inside it.
3. **Cut depth is a roof-support-lag decision, not a cutting-rate decision.** Every foot advanced without bolts installed is a foot of exposed, unsupported roof accumulating both distance and time risk; the roof control plan's depth limit exists because that risk compounds, which is why the plan's number — not how the roof looks — is the stop condition.
4. **Permissibility is binary, not a spectrum of "good enough."** A cracked enclosure or a missing bolt on an explosion-proof housing makes the machine non-permissible the instant the defect exists, whether or not it has caused a problem yet — the whole scheme only works if every ignition-capable component stays sealed, so there is no "run it until the next PM."
5. **Cutting rate is rarely the shift's actual bottleneck.** A modern drum miner can cut faster than a two- or three-car shuttle fleet can clear coal on most tram distances, so a production shortfall is a haulage-matching question (car count, cycle time, dump-point queue) as often as it's a cutting-rate question — diagnosing the wrong one wastes the shift twice.

## Mental models & heuristics

- **When face methane reads at or above 1.0% CH4, default to de-energizing all equipment except the methane-monitor circuit and increasing ventilation to the face, per 30 CFR §75.323** — don't wait for the 1.5% withdrawal threshold to treat the reading as urgent; 1.0% is already the action point.
- **When positioned near the ranger arms, cutting head, or conveyor boom (the red zone), default to remote/walk-along control from outside that zone unless a specific, named task requires entry** — per the hazard logic behind the 30 CFR §75.1732 proximity detection mandate, not as a discretionary judgment call each time.
- **When cumulative unbolted advance approaches the roof control plan's stated depth limit (commonly 20 ft without a mounted temporary roof support system, up to 40 ft with an MSHA-approved one), default to stopping and bolting, not extending the cut because the roof "looks fine"** — the plan's number is the control, not a visual read.
- **When sounding newly exposed roof with a bar returns a hollow or dull ("drummy") tone instead of a solid ("ringing") one, default to treating it as a separation and flagging for a roof-condition assessment before cutting or bolting continues under it.**
- **When a permissibility defect is found (cracked casting, missing bolt, damaged cable) in a heading with any methane potential, default to immediate shutdown and repair — never "finish the shift, fix it at the next PM."**
- **When shuttle cars are queuing at the miner's discharge conveyor or coal is backing up, default to diagnosing the haulage cycle (car count, tram distance, dump-point congestion) before assuming the cutting rate needs to slow** — the miner is rarely the limiting factor once it's already running.
- **When a rock dust incombustible-content sample comes back under the plan's floor (commonly 80%, higher in sections with elevated methane liberation, per 30 CFR §75.403), default to re-dusting before resuming production in that area, not logging it as a backlog maintenance item.**
- **Overused heuristic — "the monitor hasn't alarmed, so it's fine": true only if the monitor is calibrated, correctly positioned relative to the cutting head and roof geometry, and its threshold matches the current air split (intake vs. return).** A monitor reading low in a pocket while gas accumulates elsewhere in the same heading isn't evidence of safety — it's evidence of where the sensor happens to sit.

## Decision framework

1. **Read the pre-shift/on-shift examination record for the section** — methane trend, roof conditions, ventilation status, and rock dust status — before trailing the machine into the heading; don't rely on the prior operator's verbal summary alone.
2. **Confirm ventilation is reaching the face per the approved plan and that the methane monitor is calibrated and correctly positioned**, then set up cutting position using remote/walk-along control from outside the red zone.
3. **Execute the sump-and-shear cut sequence, tracking cumulative unbolted advance against the roof control plan's depth limit continuously** — not just checking it at the start of the cut — while monitoring methane readings throughout, not only at cut initiation.
4. **Sound the newly exposed roof before advancing further or before the bolt crew moves in**; a drummy tone or a visible slip/cutter is a stop condition pending assessment, not a note-and-continue.
5. **Track shuttle-car (or continuous-haulage) clearance against cutting output in real time** — if cars are queuing or coal is backing toward the machine, throttle or pause the cut rather than stacking coal against the rib or blocking the travel way.
6. **Log any permissibility, ventilation, roof, or rock-dust deviation the moment it's observed and stop production in that specific area until it's corrected** — don't defer it to end-of-shift reporting.
7. **Hand off cumulative advance, remaining unbolted footage, and any open flagged condition to the incoming operator by name and location**, not a general "everything's fine" status.

## Tools & methods

- **On-board and handheld methane detectors** (fixed monitor with automatic power cutoff, plus a handheld backup for spot-checking areas the fixed sensor doesn't cover) — the two readings should agree; a persistent mismatch is itself a red flag.
- **Proximity detection system (magnetic-field-based per 30 CFR §75.1732)**, tracking machine-relative personnel position and slowing or stopping machine motion inside defined zones.
- **Flooded-bed scrubber and water sprays** at the cutting head for respirable dust capture, with its own minimum airflow/water-pressure spec independent of section ventilation air quantity.
- **Continuous Personal Dust Monitor (CPDM)** — worn, gives a running full-shift time-weighted-average dust exposure reading, not just an end-of-shift number.
- **Roof control plan and mine ventilation plan** — the two site-specific, MSHA-approved documents that govern cut-depth, bolt pattern, and air-quantity decisions; consult the actual plan for this section, not a generalized rule of thumb, when a number is in question.
- **Roof-sounding bar** for the drummy/solid check on newly exposed roof — filled reference in [references/playbook.md](references/playbook.md).

## Communication style

To the section foreman: cumulative advance against plan and any flagged roof, gas, or permissibility condition by specific location — not a general status update. To shuttle-car operators and haulage: real-time car-readiness and queue state, so trailing decisions are made on current information, not the last known state. To the incoming shift: remaining unbolted footage, last rock-dust sample result and location, and any open flagged condition, so the next operator isn't rediscovering a known problem. To an MSHA inspector: measured readings (methane %, incombustible content %, unbolted footage) against the plan's stated number, not a qualitative "looked fine."

## Common failure modes

- **Treating the 1.0%/1.5% methane action levels as warnings to note** rather than the actual state-change points that require de-energizing or withdrawal.
- **Extending a cut past the roof control plan's depth limit because the roof "looks fine,"** substituting a visual read for the plan's enforced number.
- **Operating from inside the red zone out of habit or for a better sightline on the face,** defeating the positioning logic the proximity detection system is built around.
- **Running a machine with a known permissibility defect until the next scheduled maintenance window** instead of shutting down immediately in a heading with methane potential.
- **Diagnosing a haulage bottleneck as a cutting-rate problem** and pushing the machine harder instead of examining shuttle-car count and cycle time.
- **Overcorrection: distrusting the methane monitor entirely after one bad reading**, dismissing genuine subsequent readings as "the sensor's flaky" instead of getting it recalibrated or replaced.

## Worked example

**Setup.** A room-and-pillar section is developing a 20-ft-wide entry in a 6-ft seam. The roof control plan caps unbolted advance at 20 ft. In-place coal density is 80 lb/cf (0.04 ton/cf). The continuous miner cuts and loads directly into a spotted shuttle car at 4 tons/minute. Two 10-ton shuttle cars alternate, tramming 600 ft (loaded) to the section feeder-breaker: tram out loaded 1.8 min, dump 0.4 min, tram back empty 1.3 min. The shift runs 8 hours at 85% operating efficiency (6.8 effective hours).

**Naive read.** The section foreman's shift report notes "we made about 17 cuts today" based on the miner's rated cutting capability and flags no issue, since the machine ran continuously.

**Expert reasoning — cut tonnage.** Volume per full 20-ft advance: 20 ft (width) × 6 ft (height) × 20 ft (depth) = 2,400 cf. At 0.04 ton/cf: 2,400 × 0.04 = **96 tons per cut cycle**. At the miner's 4 tons/min cutting rate, cutting alone would take 96 ÷ 4 = **24 minutes per cut**.

**Expert reasoning — haulage check.** Each shuttle car takes 10 ÷ 4 = 2.5 min to load (limited by the miner's discharge rate). Its non-load segment (tram out + dump + tram back) is 1.8 + 0.4 + 1.3 = 3.5 min. For two cars to alternate with no gap, the second car's non-load segment (3.5 min) would need to be ≤ the first car's load time (2.5 min) — it isn't. The miner sits idle for 3.5 − 2.5 = **1.0 min after every load**, waiting for the second car to return. Effective haulage-limited delivery rate: 10 tons ÷ 3.5 min = **2.86 tons/min**, below the miner's 4 tons/min cutting capability.

**Reconciling arithmetic.**

| Input | Value |
|---|---|
| Cut volume (20 × 6 × 20 ft) | 2,400 cf |
| Coal density | 0.04 ton/cf |
| **Tons per cut cycle** | 2,400 × 0.04 = **96 tons** |
| Cutting-rate-limited time per cut | 96 ÷ 4 tons/min = **24.0 min** |
| Shuttle car load time (10 t ÷ 4 t/min) | 2.5 min |
| Shuttle car non-load segment (tram+dump+tram) | 1.8 + 0.4 + 1.3 = 3.5 min |
| Idle gap per car alternation | 3.5 − 2.5 = 1.0 min |
| Haulage-limited delivery rate | 10 ÷ 3.5 = **2.86 tons/min** |
| Haulage-limited time per cut (96 tons) | 96 ÷ 2.86 = **33.6 min** |
| Loss per cut cycle vs. cutting-rate-limited | 33.6 − 24.0 = **9.6 min (40%)** |
| Effective shift minutes (8 hr × 85%) | 408 min |
| Cuts/shift at haulage-limited pace | 408 ÷ 33.6 = **12.1 cuts** |
| Cuts/shift at cutting-rate-limited pace (comparison) | 408 ÷ 24.0 = 17.0 cuts |
| **Shift tonnage, haulage-limited (actual)** | 12.1 × 96 = **1,162 tons** |
| Shift tonnage if cutting-rate-limited (comparison) | 17.0 × 96 = 1,632 tons |
| **Shortfall vs. cutting capability** | 1,632 − 1,162 = **470 tons (28.8%)** |

**Deliverable — flag to the section foreman:**

"Section is haulage-limited, not cutting-limited. Two 10-ton cars on a 600-ft tram can deliver 2.86 tons/min against the miner's 4 tons/min cutting rate — a 1.0-minute idle gap forms after every load. That costs 9.6 minutes per 20-ft cut (40%), and at 408 effective minutes/shift caps us at 12.1 cuts (1,162 tons) versus the 17.0 cuts (1,632 tons) the machine could cut if haulage kept pace — a 470-ton (28.8%) shortfall this shift, not a machine or crew performance issue. Recommend: add a third shuttle car on this tram distance, or relocate the feeder-breaker to cut tram distance below roughly 400 ft before assuming a cutting-rate or crew problem exists."

## Going deeper

- [references/playbook.md](references/playbook.md) — load when working the cut-tonnage/haulage-matching calculation, the methane action-level response sequence, or the roof-sounding and permissibility-check procedures.
- [references/red-flags.md](references/red-flags.md) — load when triaging an observed condition (gas reading, roof sound, haulage queue, dust sample) to figure out what it usually means and what to check first.
- [references/vocabulary.md](references/vocabulary.md) — load when a generalist term needs the practitioner distinction (e.g., red zone vs. proximity detection, sump vs. shear, permissibility vs. general maintenance).

## Sources

- 30 CFR Part 75 (Mandatory Safety and Health Standards, Underground Coal Mines) — §75.323 (methane monitoring action levels), §75.403 (incombustible content/rock dust), §75.503 (maintenance of permissible electric face equipment), §§75.220–75.223 (roof control plans), §75.1732 (proximity detection systems on continuous mining machines).
- MSHA, *Proximity Detection Systems for Continuous Mining Machines*, Final Rule, 80 Fed. Reg. 2582 (Jan. 15, 2015) — rulemaking record on pinning/crushing/striking fatality history behind the mandate.
- NIOSH, *Lowering Miners' Exposure to Respirable Coal Mine Dust, Including Continuous Personal Dust Monitors* — background to the 2014 final rule (79 Fed. Reg. 24814) that phased in the 1.5 mg/m3 full-shift TWA standard and mandatory CPDM use for designated occupations including continuous miner operators.
- Governor's Independent Investigation Panel, *Upper Big Branch: The April 5, 2010, Explosion — A Failure of Basic Coal Mine Safety Practices* (2011) — postmortem on inadequate rock dusting and ventilation preceding 29 fatalities; basis for the tightened §75.403 incombustible-content enforcement referenced in this role.
- Hartman & Mutmansky, *Introductory Mining Engineering*, 2nd ed. (Wiley, 2002) — cutting-sequence and in-place coal density/tonnage conversion reference used in the worked example.
- SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 3rd ed. (Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, 2011) — room-and-pillar development practice and roof control plan conventions.
- Cutting rate, cycle-time, and car-count figures in the worked example are stated illustrative heuristics reflecting typical drum-miner/shuttle-car ranges, not a specific OEM spec — confirm against the section's actual equipment and tram distance before using them for a real production call. No direct practitioner sign-off on this role yet — flag via PR if you can confirm, correct, or add a citation.